You are here

Resources to help you transition to teaching online

Instructors: To support your transition to online learning, please see our resources and tools page whether you are teaching in the UK, or teaching outside of the UK.

Inspection copy update April 2020: Due to the current restrictions in place in response to COVID-19, our inspection copy policy has changed. Please refer to our updated inspection copy policy for full details. If you have recently placed an inspection copy order with us, we will be in touch to advise of any changes.

The Supreme Court Versus the Constitution
Share

The Supreme Court Versus the Constitution
A Challenge To Federalism

First Edition
Edited by:
  • Pran Chopra - Late of Political Analyst and Former Chief Editor, the Statesman


January 2006 | 288 pages | SAGE Publications Pvt. Ltd
Constitutionally, the right to amend the Constitution in India lies with Parliament alone. In recent years, however, and in an atmosphere of judicial activism, the Supreme Court has gone beyond its role as interpreter of the Constitution, becoming its arbiter. There is thus scope in India's federal structure for an impasse between the Supreme Court and Parliament which will not be resolved by referring to the Constitution.

Written against this background, this collection of essays by eminent parliamentarians, jurists, legal experts and journalists examines various aspects of this important issue, including:

- the doctrine of `basic structure', and the complex responses to and consequences of this doctrine;

- judicial review in India, in relation to the superiority of Parliament in the UK and the virtually unlimited scope of judicial review by the US Supreme Court;

- `due process of law' and its applicability in India;

- the electoral system and the threat of majoritarianism;

- federalism in India: Parliament and the state legislatures;

- The Supreme Court's creativity in interpreting the Constitution but the continuing absence of clear constitutional principles despite this.

- the Court's role as the protector of fundamental rights.

Written in an accessible style, this book is a of interested to academic reseearchers and practitioners in government studies, constitutional issues, law and politics.

I K Gujral
What Our Past Has Taught Us
Pran Chopra
The Supreme Court Versus the Constitution
 
PART ONE: PERSPECTIVES
N R Madhav Menon
Basic Structure
After Thirty Years

 
P P Rao
The Constitution, Parliament and the Judiciary
Fali Nariman
`The Doctrine' Versus `Majoritarianism'
Salman Khurshid
The Court, the Constitution and the People
Subhash Kashyap
`The Doctrine' Versus the Sovereignty of the People
S K Dholakia
The Constitution and `Due Process'
Ajay K Mehra
`Due Process' or `Procedure Established by Law'?
P K Dave
Is the `Doctrine' the Obstacle?
R K P Shankardass
Anomalies of the `Doctrine'
A M Ahmadi
Federalism Revisited
Pratap Bhanu Mehta
India's Judiciary
The Promise of Uncertainty

 
K C Pant
A `Loose' Doctrine
Ramaswamy R Iyer
A Judicial Commission?
Ajit Mozoomdar
The Supreme Court, Parliament and the Constitution
 
PART TWO
Soli Sorabjee
The Ideal Remedy
A Valediction

 
 
PART THREE
Pran Chopra
Review and Response

Preview this book

For instructors

To inquire about the availability of this title for review (print and/or digital), please contact your local sales representative or call (800) 818-7243.

Select a Purchasing Option

ISBN: 9780761934455
£14.99