Environmental Law Review is a forum for critical discussion of current and developing ideas in environmental law. It maintains a dialogue between leading edge practitioners and academics in the fields of environmental law, environmental management and business.
Whatever your professional interest, you will benefit from the analyses, criticisms and recommendations of colleagues and competitors published in Environmental Law Review. The journal will keep you in touch with current issues in UK law and policy, as well as crucial new developments in European and international law.
Environmental Law Review is a peer-reviewed journal and forum for critical discussion of current and developing ideas in environmental law. It maintains a dialogue between leading edge practitioners and academics in the fields of environmental law, environmental management and business.
|Christopher P. Rodgers||Newcastle University, UK|
|Anne-Michelle Slater||University of Aberdeen, UK|
|Andrea Ross||University of Dundee, UK|
|Jerry L. Anderson||Drake University, USA|
|Geert Van Calster||Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium|
|Rowena Cantley-Smith||Monash University, Australia|
|Paul Davies||Latham & Watkins LLP, UK|
|David Freestone||The George Washington University, USA|
|Peter Kellet||Environment Agency, UK|
|Peter Kunzlik||Nottingham Law School, UK|
|Emily Meazell||University of Oklahoma, US, USA|
|Ramon Ojeda Mestre||International Court of Environmental Arbitration and Conciliation, Mexico|
|David Noble||Parliamentary Counsel Office, NZ, New Zealand|
|Anthony Ogus||Manchester University, UK|
|The Honourable Justice Paul L. Stein AM||Court of Appeal, NSW Australia|
|Lynda M. Warren||Aberystwyth University, UK|
|Aleksandra Cavoski||University of Birmingham, UK|
|Ole Pedersen||Newcastle University, UK|
|Elen Stokes||Cardiff University, UK|
|Jasbinder K. Ghag||London, UK|
Please read the guidelines below then visit the Journal’s submission site http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/elr to upload your manuscript. Please note that manuscripts not conforming to these guidelines may be returned.
Only manuscripts of sufficient quality that meet the aims and scope of Environmental Law Review will be reviewed.
There are no fees payable to submit or publish in this journal.
As part of the submission process you will be required to warrant that you are submitting your original work, that you have the rights in the work, that you are submitting the work for first publication in the Journal and that it is not being considered for publication elsewhere and has not already been published elsewhere, and that you have obtained and can supply all necessary permissions for the reproduction of any copyright works not owned by you.
- What do we publish?
1.1 Aims & Scope
1.2 Article types
1.3 Writing your paper
- Editorial policies
2.1 Peer review policy
2.4 Declaration of conflicting interests
- Publishing policies
3.1 Publication ethics
3.2 Contributor's publishing agreement
3.3 Open access and author archiving
- Preparing your manuscript
4.2 Artwork, figures and other graphics
4.3 Supplementary material
4.4 Reference style
4.5 English language editing services
- Submitting your manuscript
5.2 Information required for completing your submission
- On acceptance and publication
6.1 SAGE Production
6.2 Online First publication
6.3 Access to your published article
6.4 Promoting your article
- Further information
Before submitting your manuscript to Environmental Law Review, please ensure you have read the Aims & Scope.
Environmental Law Review publishes original articles, opinions, case notes, legislation notes and book reviews.
Articles should be approximately 7000 words, including footnotes, in length and should contain a 200 word abstract. Longer submissions can on occasion be considered, at the editors' discretion.
Opinions are up to 1000 words in length. They express a point of view on an issue of general or topical interest.
Manuscripts of Opinions should be sent to:
Jasbinder K. Ghag
Case notes including footnotes are up to 4000 words in length. They should contain: (a) a brief title to indicate what the case was about. (b) The case name. (c) A short list of key words. (d) A short paragraph outlining the facts. (e) The key elements of the judgment. (f) A commentary which should be a succinct analysis and comment on the case.
Case notes should be sent to:
Dr Brian Jack
School of Law
Queen's University of Belfast,
Belfast BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK
Tel: +44(0) 28 9027 3451 Fax +44(0) 28 9032 5590
Professor Karen Morrow
Centre for Environmental and Enerfy Law and Policy, School of Law
Swansea, SA2 8PP, Wales, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1792 602623
Book reviews are up to 1000 words in length. Very brief book reviews are also acceptable.
Book reviews should be submitted to:
School of Law, Taylor Building
University of Aberdeen
Old Aberdeen, AB24 3UB, UK
Legislation Notes should be sent to:
Professor Maria Lee
Faculty of Laws,
University College London
Endsleigh Gardens, London WC1H 0EG, UK
Tel. +44 (0) 207 679 1449
Footnotes should not be collated at the end of the article, but will be published at the foot of each relevant page. Footnotes to the title and author(s)' names should be designated as *, † etc. Footnotes to the text should be designated as 1, 2, 3 etc. and follow any closing punctuation, e.g. …limitations are possible.¹ The asterisked footnote should give the author's position, institutional address and any brief acknowledgements if required.
The SAGE Author Gateway has some general advice and on how to get published, plus links to further resources.
1.3.1 Make your article discoverable
When writing up your paper, think about how you can make it discoverable. The title, keywords and abstract are key to ensuring readers find your article through search engines such as Google. For information and guidance on how best to title your article, write your abstract and select your keywords, have a look at this page on the Gateway: How to Help Readers Find Your Article Online.
Environmental Law Journal adheres to a rigorous double-anonymize reviewing policy in which the identity of reviewers and authors are concealed from both parties.
All parties who have made a substantive contribution to the article should be listed as authors. Principal authorship, authorship order, and other publication credits should be based on the relative scientific or professional contributions of the individuals involved, regardless of their status. A student is usually listed as principal author on any multiple-authored publication that substantially derives from the student’s dissertation or thesis.
All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an Acknowledgements section. Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help, or a department chair who provided only general support.
Please supply any personal acknowledgements separately to the main text to facilitate anonymous peer review.
2.3.1 Third party submissions
Where an individual who is not listed as an author submits a manuscript on behalf of the author(s), a statement must be included in the Acknowledgements section of the manuscript and in the accompanying cover letter. The statements must:
• Disclose this type of editorial assistance – including the individual’s name, company and level of input
• Identify any entities that paid for this assistance
• Confirm that the listed authors have authorized the submission of their manuscript via third party and approved any statements or declarations, e.g. conflicting interests, funding, etc.
Where appropriate, SAGE reserves the right to deny consideration to manuscripts submitted by a third party rather than by the authors themselves.
Environmental Law Review encourages authors to include a declaration of any conflicting interests and recommends you review the good practice guidelines on the SAGE Journal Author Gateway.
SAGE is committed to upholding the integrity of the academic record. We encourage authors to refer to the Committee on Publication Ethics’ International Standards for Authors and view the Publication Ethics page on the SAGE Author Gateway.
Environmental Law Review and SAGE take issues of copyright infringement, plagiarism or other breaches of best practice in publication very seriously. We seek to protect the rights of our authors and we always investigate claims of plagiarism or misuse of published articles. Equally, we seek to protect the reputation of the journal against malpractice. Submitted articles may be checked with duplication-checking software. Where an article, for example, is found to have plagiarised other work or included third-party copyright material without permission or with insufficient acknowledgement, or where the authorship of the article is contested, we reserve the right to take action including, but not limited to: publishing an erratum or corrigendum (correction); retracting the article; taking up the matter with the head of department or dean of the author's institution and/or relevant academic bodies or societies; or taking appropriate legal action.
3.1.2 Prior publication
If material has been previously published it is not generally acceptable for publication in a SAGE journal. However, there are certain circumstances where previously published material can be considered for publication. Please refer to the guidance on the SAGE Author Gateway or if in doubt, contact the Editor at the address given below.
Before publication, SAGE requires the author as the rights holder to sign a Journal Contributor’s Publishing Agreement. SAGE’s Journal Contributor’s Publishing Agreement is an exclusive licence agreement which means that the author retains copyright in the work but grants SAGE the sole and exclusive right and licence to publish for the full legal term of copyright. Exceptions may exist where an assignment of copyright is required or preferred by a proprietor other than SAGE. In this case copyright in the work will be assigned from the author to the society. For more information please visit the SAGE Author Gateway.
Environmental Law Review offers optional open access publishing via the SAGE Choice programme. For more information please visit the SAGE Choice website. For information on funding body compliance, and depositing your article in repositories, please visit SAGE Publishing Policies on our Journal Author Gateway.
The preferred format for your manuscript is Word. LaTeX files are also accepted. Word and (La)Tex templates are available on the Manuscript Submission Guidelines page of our Author Gateway.
For guidance on the preparation of illustrations, pictures and graphs in electronic format, please visit SAGE’s Manuscript Submission Guidelines.
Figures supplied in colour will appear in colour online regardless of whether or not these illustrations are reproduced in colour in the printed version. For specifically requested colour reproduction in print, you will receive information regarding the costs from SAGE after receipt of your accepted article.
This journal is able to host additional materials online (e.g. datasets, podcasts, videos, images etc) alongside the full-text of the article. For more information please refer to our guidelines on submitting supplementary files.
All references should be placed in footnotes. End notes will not be accomodated.
Cases should be cited in the following forms:
Quick v Taff-Ely Borough Council  QB 809
Case 102/79 Commission v Belgium  ECR 1473
Case C-337/89 Commission v UK  ECR I-1613
If specific pages are referred to:
Quick v Taff-Ely Borough Council  QB 809 at 811
No full stops should be used in the law journal abbreviation, e.g. All ER, WLR, EGLR etc.
Abbreviations should be used for familiar legal journals. Otherwise the title should be given in full in italics:
J. Cohen, 'A Theory of the Stability of Punishment' (1983) 64 Journal of Criminal Law 198
The following styles should be used:
M. A. Jones, Textbook on Torts, 2nd edn (Blackstone Press: London, 1989) 234
G. Richard, 'Judicial Intervention' in M. Maguire (ed.), Accountability (Tavistock: London, 1985) 113
The following forms should be used: The Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995, s. 3(1)(a)
Conservation (Natural Habitats etc.) Regulations 1994 (SI 1994, No. 2716)
Council (or Commission) Directive 70/157/EEC (OJ L42/16 23.2.70) on waste disposal etc.
Waste Disposal Directive when used subsequently in the text
Council (or Commission) Decision C(91)440
Treaty on European Union
These should be cited in the form:
Law Commission, Family Law: The Ground for Divorce, Cm 192 (1992) para. 4.5
References should be cited in full on the first occasion they are mentioned. Subsequent cross-references should take the following form:
See Walter, above n. 4 at 23
If Walter is referred to in the text after it has been cited for first time, the cross-reference will be:
Above n. 4 at 23
If the cross-reference is to the immediately preceding note, the reference will be:
Ibid. at 23
Quotations within the text should use single quotation marks and quotations within quotations use double quotation marks. If quotations are three lines or more they should be separated out from the rest of the text and should not be enclosed by quotation marks.
Authors seeking assistance with English language editing, translation, or figure and manuscript formatting to fit the journal’s specifications should consider using SAGE Language Services. Visit SAGE Language Services on our Journal Author Gateway for further information.
Environmental Law Review is hosted on SAGE Track, a web based online submission and peer review system powered by ScholarOne™ Manuscripts. Visit http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/elr to login and submit your article online.
IMPORTANT: Please check whether you already have an account in the system before trying to create a new one. If you have reviewed or authored for the journal in the past year it is likely that you will have had an account created. For further guidance on submitting your manuscript online please visit ScholarOne Online Help.
As part of our commitment to ensuring an ethical, transparent and fair peer review process SAGE is a supporting member of ORCID, the Open Researcher and Contributor ID. ORCID provides a unique and persistent digital identifier that distinguishes researchers from every other researcher, even those who share the same name, and, through integration in key research workflows such as manuscript and grant submission, supports automated linkages between researchers and their professional activities, ensuring that their work is recognized.
The collection of ORCID iDs from corresponding authors is now part of the submission process of this journal. If you already have an ORCID iD you will be asked to associate that to your submission during the online submission process. We also strongly encourage all co-authors to link their ORCID ID to their accounts in our online peer review platforms. It takes seconds to do: click the link when prompted, sign into your ORCID account and our systems are automatically updated. Your ORCID iD will become part of your accepted publication’s metadata, making your work attributable to you and only you. Your ORCID iD is published with your article so that fellow researchers reading your work can link to your ORCID profile and from there link to your other publications.
You will be asked to provide contact details and academic affiliations for all co-authors via the submission system and identify who is to be the corresponding author. These details must match what appears on your manuscript. At this stage please ensure you have included all the required statements and declarations and uploaded any additional supplementary files (including reporting guidelines where relevant).
Please also ensure that you have obtained any necessary permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere. For further information including guidance on fair dealing for criticism and review, please see the Copyright and Permissions page on the SAGE Author Gateway.
Your SAGE Production Editor will keep you informed as to your article’s progress throughout the production process. Proofs will be sent by PDF to the corresponding author and should be returned promptly. Authors are reminded to check their proofs carefully to confirm that all author information, including names, affiliations, sequence and contact details are correct, and that Funding and Conflict of Interest statements, if any, are accurate. Please note that if there are any changes to the author list at this stage all authors will be required to complete and sign a form authorising the change.
Online First allows final articles (completed and approved articles awaiting assignment to a future issue) to be published online prior to their inclusion in a journal issue, which significantly reduces the lead time between submission and publication. Visit the SAGE Journals help page for more details, including how to cite Online First articles.
SAGE provides authors with online access to their final article.
Publication is not the end of the process! You can help disseminate your paper and ensure it is as widely read and cited as possible. The SAGE Author Gateway has numerous resources to help you promote your work. Visit the Promote Your Article page on the Gateway for tips and advice.
Any correspondence, queries or additional requests for information on the manuscript submission process should be sent to the Environmental Law Review editorial office as follows:
All original articles must be submitted via the online system. If you would like to discuss your paper prior to submission, please refer to the contact details below.
Professor Christopher P. Rodgers: email@example.com